-
GET INVOLVED
Take action for a better future.
-
JOIN
Join Americans for Prosperity
-
CONTRIBUTE
Changing the Nation, One State at a Time
Take action for a better future.
Join Americans for Prosperity
Changing the Nation, One State at a Time
By: R.J. Moeller
I've mentioned on this site before the analogy of all that goes into the making of a #2 pencil in describing how complex a market economy is. Columnist Jonah Goldberg (LA Times, National Review) has a new piece that re-visits this metaphor and expounds on the humbling lessons one can learn from it.
In 1958, Leonard Read wrote one of the most famous essays in the history of libertarianism, “I, Pencil.” It begins, “I am a lead pencil — the ordinary wooden pencil familiar to all boys and girls and adults who can read and write.” It is one of the most simple objects in human civilization. And yet, “not a single person on the face of this earth knows how to make me.”
The pencil tells the story of its own creation. The wood comes from Oregon, or perhaps California. The lead, which is really graphite, is mined in Ceylon (now Sri Lanka). The eraser, which is not rubber but something called “factice,” is “made by reacting rape-seed oil from the Dutch East Indies with sulfur chloride.”
To make a long story short, the simple act of collecting and combining the ingredients of a pencil involves the cooperation of thousands of experts in dozens of fields, from engineering and mining to chemistry and commodity trading. I suppose it’s possible for someone to master all of the knowledge and expertise to make a pencil all by himself, but why would he?
The lessons one can draw from this fact are humbling. For starters, any healthy civilization, never mind any healthy economy, involves unfathomably vast amounts of harmonious cooperation.
Goldberg continues:
The modern market economy is the greatest communal enterprise ever undertaken in the history of humanity. Friedrich Hayek did the heavy lifting on this point over half a century ago in his essay “The Use of Knowledge in Society.” The efficient pricing of markets allows millions of independent actors to decide for themselves how to allocate resources. According to Hayek, no central planner or bureaucrat could ever have enough knowledge to consistently and successfully guide all of those economic actions in a more efficient manner.
The latest proof of Hayek’s insight can be found not only in the economic winter that goes by the label “recovery summer,” but in the crown jewel of the stimulus known as “cash for clunkers,” which subsidized car purchases that would have happened anyway. That’s a major reason the auto industry just had its worst August in 27 years. Meanwhile, lower-income buyers are seeing used-car prices soar thanks to the artificial scarcity created by destroying perfectly good “clunkers.”
But that’s a small point in the grand scheme of things. According to progressives, the financial crisis discredited “market fundamentalism” and created a burning need for a more cooperative society where “we’re all in it together.” It’s an ancient argument, with many noble intentions behind it. But it rests on a misunderstanding of one simple, astounding, irrefutable fact. The market economy is cooperative, and more successfully so than any alternative system ever conceived of, never mind put into practice. Admittedly it doesn’t feel that way, which is why everyone wants to find a better replacement for it. But they never will, for the same reason no one can make a pencil.
These are critically important points to consider in our own state as we near the November election. The entrenched bureaucracy (and prolific corruption) this state sadly boasts is a result of centralized power in the hands of the few. For this to ever truly change, millions of citizens will have to be willing to eat some humble pie and acknowledge they have been wrong for a very long time about which policies and politicians they support.
Republican democracy and a free market economy require constant vigilance and participation from the citizenry. The American Left is fundamentally flawed precisely because they think they can make a pencil without you. They think that knowledge learned at an Ivy League school is a legitimate substitute for wisdom learned from starting a business, raising a family, or fighting for your country.
As William F. Buckley famously once quipped: "I'd rather be governed by the first 500 names in the Boston phone-book than the entire faculty at Harvard."